
Part 1. | Part 2. | Part 3.
Part 4.
14. A Tale of two cities
15. What have we come to
16. The war of all against all
17. The Humanist consequence
18. Who will speak?
Part 4
Step 14:
A tale of Two Cities:
The simple explanation of the world financial system! When knowledge is power ignorance is death. Should we not ask ourselves: Why are the rich getting richer and the poor poorer?
The stock-market behaves erratically and pundits give advice: “If you don't have to sell don’t worry, so long as you are in for the long haul good stocks will always come good. There has never been a ten year period when prices have not advanced; now is the time to look for good buying.”
Parrots sitting in a 1,000 year old tree might give each other similar advice but, when rot is in the heartwood; or when an axe-man stands at the base and says, “I can get a big home out of this one” then all past history of the tree becomes irrelevant.
Irrespective of tides, Stock-market waves come and go, but the usurious commercial system is rotten to the core. It seems likely an axe-man is saying the tree of usurious commerce stands in the path of human progress. Intelligence says that this huge tree will fall. It may take time but it will fall hard. This is not a time for nesting in the branches.
We are advised to take note of both old and new knowledge. Old knowledge shows us that things not only follow patterns of change but that patterns also end. We need old history to know ourselves and we need new history to see that to advance in achievement requires the courage to change lives and attitudes. A problem of culture is that we get stuck in a groove of pride and prejudice, we fear to admit of need to change and our religion of life turns to dead dogma – to avoid the progress of a leap of faith we sell our souls.
Globalists own the world financial system; by this power they ignore frontiers and national governments. They plan a worldto their design and delete unneeded population. The financial power of this group is based on a system of corruption that is, in the Christian Bible, called usury. Usury is most commonly understood in relation to money but money represents labour; usury can be as simple as one person taking unfair advantage of another.
How does the usurious financial system operate? It operates similar to a gambling casino. A Gambling Casino is set up to take advantage of gamblers. A properly run casino does not itself gamble it makes its profit by taking a percentage of the money gambled by others – each time it is gambled; a perfect goods and services tax.
The world financial ‘city’ is set up to take advantage of players in the game of life. Neither the ‘city of finance’ nor the ‘Casino’ creates value. The production of others is stolen by legalized fraud.
The Banking City Casino:
Suppose a thousand gamblers, each with a $million dollars, are locked in a Casino to gamble until one has all the money. In time half will have lost their money and been tossed out. Do you think that at this time the half remaining have average of two $million each? Of course not, the Casino, taking its percentage on each play will already have millions in profit.
The Casino owners observe the scene; the game might be over too soon so they take some unlucky gamblers aside and offer loans at x%: some jump at the chance.
The game is now very pleasing to the casino owners! The owners are not actually risking any money; loans may appear as if deductions from profits but, as we will see, they risk nothing.
The game goes on, some losers are removed, others are loaned more money to keep them in the game; eventually only one is left. This ‘lucky’ player has several million dollars in chips, but wait, how much does he owe the Casino? Even the winner could leave in debt.
Can it be arranged so cleverly that all loans will be repaid in full? Does it matter? Some may have been thrown out owing big debts to the casino. Who cares? The casino finishes with all, or almost all, the money brought into the game! Those ejected with debt leave with only debt; if the casino can squeeze repayment out of these it is not to recover losses, it is added profit. All that was given was gambling credit!
The suckers kept the game alive while the casino collected the real money. The casino gained all, or most of, $1,000 million from the world and returned only misery. That is what usury means!
So there it is: the tale of two cities: the city of finance and the city of Commerce. Like our imaginary Casino, Globalists now possess most of what is of value in our world; they sell us credit to manipulate the game. Do they still need us?
The time when our wealthy nations become poor nations may be closer than we think. What nation is not in debt? What nation has escaped the mind manipulators?
It is now near one hundred years since the international bankers showed their claws to bring the US and Australian governments into line.
The persistent ruthless power and the nature of the force behind it demonstrate the pathetic weakness and servility of party politics. But above all is the eternal glory of life and the truth that sustains it.
Do you imagine that those owning the world financial system do not have the power to wreck the world economy by causing collapse of the Stock Market and banking systems? Do you imagine that they fully understand what they are doing?
They do not imagine it will hurt them but causes and consequences are more complicated than they imagine? Only they know when they will pull the plug but the signs are in the air. The end will be when Globalism forecloses on the globe.
We can’t sit back and leave it to God to fix, recall: "He who is not with me is against me!" we have to prove we value our human gifts! We have the strength and ability to clean up our mess! Do we have the will?
We do not have to live by imposed values or gamble life away! Freedom is our birthright! We can govern ourselves! Our fears and torments are of our own creation! Truth is the thing of great value in our field of life!
We cannot live in progress with our own corruption! Let the ‘Great Whore’ of Commerce meet justice!
Some may think this simile simplistic? Today we feel the winds of change. Un-repayable loans are not made because bankers are too stupid to realize that they will never be repaid, they are made to serve their own ends. When they close the casino they claim ownership of the world.
Read Revelation 17: 1-18. Also 18: 1-24 see the “Great Whore” intimately tied to trade and commerce in Book 5. The Great Whore represents the usurious financial system and dates from Babylon. The ocean below her is the ocean of peoples. The seven hills are therefore seven nations of leading influence ruled by seven kings or leaders. Don’t be put off by dead religious dogma.
Step 15:
What have we come to?
Quote: "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." James Madison, Former US President to W.T. Barry, 1822.
It is high time to start thus arming ourselves for we now desperately need to govern ourselves. Is enslavement to despotism less important than primitive music, passing pleasure, sporting events and junk food?
Recent news: a thief awarded $50,000 because (said the Judge) force used to subdue him (bruises and a cracked skull) was excessive. Had he been asked nicely to go and then seized advantage to kill in return for this kindness he would not have earned $50,000. Brilliant thinking is a sign of our times?
An interesting example: Extracts from a long letter by book author Chip Elliott, written in response to an Esquire Magazine article entitled "Fifty Million Handguns". His letter so impressed the editors they used it as the cover story in the September 1981 issue. Elliott's comments have growing, worldwide relevance in a culture that ties its hands to fight for justice.
Quote shortened for space: "The streets of America...are as dangerous as the roads and alleys of an earlier century. … I went to carrying a 9mm Smith & Wesson automatic in ten weeks. My wife is a psychiatrist. Very attractive, very easy to intimidate, very abstracted, a likely target for muggers both outside, because she's lost in her thoughts, and at home, because punks think doctors keep drugs in their houses (they don't).
She has a gun, too, a .38, and she knows how to use it. We are not hillbillies: we are people who went to Radcliffe and Stanford, respectively. Appalling, huh? It used to appall us too, until we were forced to realize that our lives … were worth protecting. …
[1978] … we moved to Los Angeles. … all was not as it seemed in Venice. For starters, we had moved to the intersection of turfs of two rival Mexican gangs. We got along with them. When they shot at each other—as they did less than a week after we had moved in—they shouted to us in Spanish to get out of the way.
We did. There were other clues. Walking, I would occasionally see brown spots on the sidewalk that, from my experience as a police reporter, I could recognize as bloodstains. I would notice this the way you might notice a scruff of feathers where something has gotten a small bird: a tiny memorial to violence.
One morning … I watched a gang … pour gasoline all over a parked car and set it on fire. … Broad daylight. A few days later, I heard of a robbery two blocks from where we lived: A woman came to the door of a house and asked to use the telephone, said it was an emergency. When the man opened the door, her henchmen came in right behind her. The three of them stabbed the man to death and left his wife barely alive. In the next block a woman was raped twice after her nose and jaw were broken.
Just to be on the safe side ... bought a .38 snub-nosed revolver. After all, this was Los Angeles. But a gun! Who had ever owned a gun? It cost $160. … I would rather have bought a painting. … we went to the Fox Venice to see Forbidden Planet … When we returned, the door had been broken in. The stereo was gone, the television was gone, the paintings and cameras and typewriters were gone. The dressers had been turned over and ransacked, the bed had been torn up and the revolver taken; the birdcage had been torn off the wall and the parakeet set free for a while until the cat got it and ate it, leaving the remains on the floor where a rug had been. …
… On the seventeenth of December in 1978, I saw a woman mugged for her purse—and I watched her run screaming after her assailant until she collapsed, crying in the street.
On the eighteenth or nineteenth of December, my wife was at a meeting, … I walked alone to the Venice Sidewalk Cafe for some dinner. It occurred to me that it was silly to put on a shoulder holster just to go out for a beer and a sandwich, but I did it anyway, …
Walking home about six-thirty at night, just off the corner of West Washington Boulevard and Westminster Avenue, I was confronted by five young, well-dressed uptown brothers. Black. Okay. … They could just as easily have been white. We were directly under a streetlight and less than fifty feet from an intersection thick with traffic.
I was not dressed as a high roller. ... I look like exactly what I am, a middle-aged guy who's seen a little more than he needs to see. I thought, what are these guys doing? Their leader pulled a kitchen knife out of his two-hundred-dollar leather jacket. His mistake was that he wasn't close enough to me to use it, only to threaten me. He smiled at me and said, "Just the wallet, man. Won't be no trouble."
That was a very long moment for me. I remember it just as it happened. I remember thinking at the time that it was one of those moments that are supposed to be charged with electricity. It wasn't. It was hollow, silent, and chilly.
I looked at this guy and at his companions and at his knife, and I thought: Don't you see how you're misreading me? I am not a victim. I used to be a victim, but now I'm not. Can't you see the difference?
I pulled the automatic, leveled it at them and said very clearly, "You must be dreaming." The guy smiled at me and said, "Sheeeit," and his buddies laughed, and he began to move toward me with the knife. I thought, this guy is willing to kill me for thirty-five dollars. I aimed the automatic at the outer edge of his left thigh and shot him.
He dropped like a high jumper hitting the bar and yelled "Goddamn!" three times, the first one from amazement, I guess, and the second two higher pitched and from pain. He yelled at his buddies, "Ain't you gonna do nothing?" They did do nothing.
… I was not coming on like James Bond, … I was simply protecting my right to walk around town with a lousy thirty-five dollars in my pocket and not be afraid for my life.
… I felt terribly strange, … I realized that what I was doing—in our current state of affairs—was a cultural procedure no different from going to the grocery or getting a haircut or buying a shirt. … if I wanted to stay alive, it was possible I would have to get used to it. …
What happened to us, … My world changed sometime between 1975 and 1980, … We were lucky. We lost more than eleven thousand dollars of what we owned, but we weren't killed. We adapted. Now the guns are a normal part of our lives. …
… We accept it as a fact of life and go right on. And it will stay a fact of life until our fellow countrymen get it out of their heads that they can do as they please, that there is no such thing as social responsibility that they have a right not to behave. Because …, if they have the right to mug us, we have the right to shoot them.
I used to believe that these people had some justifications on their side. I used to feel that I ought to have some compassion for them, and I did. I used to believe that a job and some credit would put them on the right path. It isn't true. I also used to believe that much of the human wreckage—the millions upon millions of people with emotional damage—could be repaired. That isn't true either. …
Let's face it. … not all of them are poor, not by a long shot. End quote.
So what was that you were saying about terrorism? I don't know if Chip was charged, today he probably would be – now if you kill an honest person it's sad – if you kill a crook its murder. The criminal is the victim of the community, and that's not trivial! But the criminal culture that creates the crime is never put on trial!
The sickly laws, the mis-education, we should be able to sue governments that pass unrealistic legislation and allow mass-media to promote crime. The changes that have come about in response to humanist philosophy are, as we can see, able to be understood but not exposed to justice.
The above is a small sample of everyday events in ‘western democracies’. Our culture is criminal and criminals have more protection under law than those honest. That’s our culture; street crime kills and maims more people than common terrorism!
Ideologues use mind virus deliberately to cause social disintegration? We pay the price of consequences but no one is blamed or asked to pay for causes?
Those who do the dirty work are just the ‘useful idiots’ of manipulators. They believe the simple-minded ideas. Guns neither make the honest into criminals nor lack of guns save lives.
Step 16:
The war of all against all
"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind.
And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar".
Julius Caesar
The above is interesting but says nothing a student of human behaviour should not know. We watch it happen , and for greed and shame prefer to deny it!
When war is called peace, hate will be called love. War then becomes righteous and truth becomes crime. George Orwell warned of manipulation by deletion of words and confusion of meanings! Alert readers must be increasingly alarmed at talk of war, ‘pre-emptive’ strikes and virus threats that sound warnings of biological attack. The nature of war has changed and true national governments long gone!
You cannot inoculate against an unknown virus but you can persuade people that you are protecting them while you inject harmfully. Sick people can't fight!
Powerful nations are now servants of global interests. Scientific war is uncaring and contemptuous! Terrorism results from an unjust use of power by those who need to reduce population. How they do so will be visible only in events. Terrorism creates distraction.
Our world is now filled with dangers! However, if we close our eyes to danger we cannot guard against it. What is reported here is not newly discovered nor made up by me, we deal with matters of established (but not publicised) knowledge. Knowing means little without understanding – many are aware of danger but few see reasons or consequences.
Public concern withers when dangers are hidden behind lies; we are led to believe that things of great importance are massively publicized; truth in short un-dramatized news is ignored. Be warned!
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Dr. Brock Chisholm, in his book, "Can Society Keep Pace With Science" lifted a veil back in 1946. He was in a position to see developments that are only now coming to public notice.
Quote: “Any country reasonably free to visitors can be neutralised as an effective fighting force within a few weeks. If any government becomes convinced that it will have to fight any other country at any time it would be very foolish indeed not to neutralise that other country at once.
Any realistic government can be counted on to take that action. A thousand or so of visitors could spread bacteria or toxins to paralyse any country's power of aggression.” End quote.
Are new diseases, or new strains of old diseases, chance created or results of experiments to develop weapons more dangerous than nuclear weapons? (See: AIDS – a politically protected disease). AIDS has killed or disabled far more people than atomic weapons.
Will governments keep to international agreements? As Dr. Chisholm presents it, any nation that is seen as a ‘possible’ threat must be treated as deadly and ‘neutralized’. Unjustified attack, in this view is justified – provided of course, that it is your nation and you can think of a reason.
We have no defence against paranoid aggressive leaders unless we exercise our right of self-government, and in that, of course, we have failed so shamefully.
The 'toads' in their ideological 'toad halls' easily agree with the nice Doctor: if you see someone is planning to attack you, then it makes sense to hit first. It is easy to see it that way but what he actually said was: “If any government becomes convinced that it will have to fight any other country at any time”.
So where does it end – or, more urgently, begin? When national governments are just global government stooges – when people elect politicians chosen by (to serve) foreign interests, then where do our convictions originate?
We now live in a New World Order.
Is there any nation today that might not be ‘convinced’ that it will have to fight another, or others? In this century we have already seen the pre-emptive strike scenario advocated and used; war is no longer fought with civilized honor, it is now international criminal assault and leaders, having access to weapons overwhelming in mass destruction, can claim existence of threat as excuse to destroy what are (in modern terms defenceless) nations?
Or; alternatively, exploit others so long as they can be restrained in ‘hit-back’ ability? Is the only answer that the most powerful eliminate all possible opponents? Humanists/evolutionists call it "survival of the fittest" – but only if it is their call!
While the new moral attitude may appear reasonable to those confident of their strength, the possibilities for terrorism today are such that even those involved may not think of all options. Oil shortage excuses a war but short-sightedness does not see that oil itself is our enemy of mass destruction.
Were we ever in greater danger?
The real potential of despair-based terrorism as against the terrorism of people manipulation, is yet to be proven. Under a secretive world government, who has the power? Who, seriously studying world affairs, is not aware that our most powerful nation is being progressively undermined?
Knowledgeable financial tipsters forecast a MASSIVE crash of the USA economy; a crash whose effects will flow, like a tsunami around the world? The USA could be facing such a financial crash that, in the not too distant future, it will no longer be the world’s leading nation. What will be the consequences?
The New World Order is no longer news but 55 years after the Chisholm statement we have an even newer world-order and many nations now able to produce toxins and deadly bacteria. At the same time, in a fragile ‘modern’ culture, where great cities seldom have more than a few days food or fuel in reserve; where electricity blackout can be a national disaster, simple tools may cause huge damage.
With weapons easier produced than nuclear, an attack may be without warning or identification. Blame is easily allocated by one to another!
This was the danger Chisholm foresaw but his defence strategy would need takeover of smaller nations before they became alert to ‘alternative weapons’ potential and to their own desperate situation. Today, many small nations will be fearful for their future and seeking weapons for defence – or revenge. So I ask: “What government, if it can develop an effective genetic or biological weapon, may not be doing so now that the seed of fear is planted”?
Who dares wait to see who is hit next? Who will not place his weapons where a first strike will not harm them – in the enemy heartland!
Who may feel forced to ever more desperate action? When national death seems imminent then national suicide, if mutually destructive of an enemy, may seem a bitter, even if futile, option. A deadly disease could be hidden in your city as an option for revenge by some small nation that feels under threat.
What CAN we DO?
A cheap, humane defence against terrorism is to eliminate the cause of injustice and despair! But the earth trembles; the smell of fear rises; pre-emptive strike is policy of war openly stated. Even so, we may still escape disaster.
We CAN reveal the evidence that we are not mere biological animals unable to distinguish between good and evil. We CAN explain, and expose to the world in a “realistic” way, that there is a Creator beyond all man-manipulated religions; that an incredible future is there for our choice!
We CAN choose and elect our own representatives to our parliaments! Having done this then neighbours, knowing “we the people” control our government, will agree to abandon terrorist weapons – yes, they will agree – they too want to live.
We have the way! Do we have the will? If we are to survive we have to use the two-edged sword of truth: the sword that cuts both ways. If we do not use truth in human service, then we will find ourselves cut down by the truth of our inhumanity.
Oh yes! "Who is this Brock Chisholm M.D."? Well he was the first director of the World Health Organization and lauded by the Humanist Association as Humanist of the year. He represents well, the amoral attitude! The danger and short-sightedness of humanism, and those of the ‘New World Order’ he hoped to motivate.
Hunt for an Anthrax Killer:
How close to home is terror? In 2004 an hour-long USA T.V. program looked into the anthrax attacks in the USA. It is not likely that national governments are involved with terrorist events because people chosen as quislings are just too unreliable for jobs of such sensitivity. But for Globalism the door to involvement is wide open.
The biological weapons warning was given by Dr. Chisholm in 1946; ample time to allow thinking through, detailing and planning 9/11.
The TV anthrax program found the anthrax had come from heartland US bio-defence laboratories. This was uncovered by analytical equipment able to analyse genetic structure to distinguish, not only between US anthrax and that in possession of Iraq, but even between laboratories.
As might be expected, with the CIA and other high-level investigators on the job, the trail to those actually responsible became a little muddy, it seems the culprit/s will remain free. This has not since been disputed.
A leading commentator thought the culprits might be patriots who were unhappy with progress in bio-defence. Sacrifice "for the greater good", though of dubious morality, is not uncommon. Some may ask, “If they wanted to kill people why did they fail so badly?” But why would they want to kill a lot of people when all they want is to ‘fan the flames of hate and fear’ so as to keep the commonalty behind the war effort?
Have we not been prepared for such by TV propaganda on lines of crazy ‘right wing’ patriots? While it is not uncommon, we have to be suspicious of dissident cells in the secret services and heartland defence research organizations of leading nations. But recall: a famous president said, “In politics, if it happens you can bet your life it was planned that way.”
Dissident cells are allowed/helped to form in order to aid clandestine or illegal operations. If things go wrong these cells are disposable without much harm. Such cells are too small to work on their own but can be of vital service to clandestine operations, their formation is made easy by influence of humanist value-free education.
Not for amateurs!
The skills shown – level of science – access – all rule out common terrorists as source of these attacks.
In this case the probability of Globalist Secret Service involvement borders on certainty, but not saying on National TV. The plan only benefited the ‘NWO’ program of creating fear, conflict and confusion.
Both use of aircraft as bombs and success of the anthrax campaign needed planning by true professionals with access to science, technology and facilities far beyond the reasonable reach of common terrorists.
As with the ‘aircraft as bombs’ strike, the importance of the mission and skills needed would forbid that success be left in the hands of trainee pilots, such could only be used to secure the controls and follow simple orders to direct the aircraft into position for auto-pilot to fly the aircraft accurately and free of emotion to target.
Such operations need access to high-level technology to create equipment and access aircraft; to terrorist groups to do the dirty work; to flight programs of airlines and scheduling of aircraft (the right aircraft have to be at the right place when the hi-jack crews board). Such highly complex operations are not for amateurs.
Only an international organization with secure contacts and devious purposes can do this. So I hope you saw the ‘anthrax’ program and become aware that leading technology does not secure our safety.
Nuclear technology spread quickly and, as seen, we are not safe from biological weapons created in our own service.
There is clear distinction between elite and common terrorism. They reveal them-selves by their technical sophistication.
What I say will not worry Globalists; the public mind is set to respond to mass media. These reports just reassure the trusting that ‘our’ government is open and honest. But we also know we are enslaved by a philosophy of social ignorance and will only be secure when we take responsibility for our own governing.
Quote: “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we have been bamboozled long enough we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We are no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge even to ourselves that we have been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back. So the old bamboozles tend to persist as new ones arise.” End quote. Carl Sagan.
Yes we are being fooled! We love the mob and fear truth but the question remains: how important is family and future to you?
Robert Weston: Let no man fear for the truth, that doubt may consume her; only he that would shut out his doubts denieth the truth.
Step 17:
The Humanist Consequence
Many, in ‘western' cultures, now believe we were created by chance in a universe that came into existence by – no answer, “Big Bang from zero” no cause, no glimpse of what, why, where or how.
Though all choices lack origin, only "Intelligent Creation" does not suffer secure evidence against it, as does "Chance Creation". Many ignore truth because of feeling that so many clever people cannot be forever fooled but past civilizations, religions and cultural beliefs prove otherwise.
Emotion, pride and the comfort of peer group support all repeatedly make fools of the most intelligent of this world! We only need look at “Peer Groups” today to see how well “gradualism” works as a principle to deceive self and society. Simplism easily overcomes intelligence to foil logical understanding of our world.
For instance: we now think that the frantic reaction to friendships between young and older people is about protection the young from an increasing sexual abuse! Laws, we think, support that. But the young, pressured by constant seduction of mass entertainment, education and community acceptance, become sexually mature years earlier than is natural – extreme cases as young as nine years.
These pressures force children to sexual activity irrespective of what the law may say. The disgust generated by thoughts of older people leading the young astray is clearly not to stop the youth abuse that results from cultural sickness.
Children are abused by popular seduction (carried out constantly and blatantly by the community)! It is part of the ‘dumbing down’ process whose purpose is to delay or abort intellectual development.
Law is combined with whipping-up of emotions to protect and camouflage that program and help give appearance of legality to a political plan!
Segregation is vital to the takeover of the public mind! If peer groups were allowed to mix freely, as intellectual development requires, any changing of adolescent attitude would be questioned. Even if not, there would be a levelling and secret effort put into cultural change largely lost.
Parents also threaten the work of change agents; that is why young children are pressured into kindergarten for sly denigration of parents, this is made easier because the newly separated child feels deserted.
Human Intelligence:
Ask yourself: If those who planned and promoted the chance creation theory really believed it, why would they be so frantic about having others believe it? If there is no intelligence behind our creation, no future beyond this life, then no benefit or loss comes from how we behave. Therefore nature would suggest we be nice to each other and make the best of it with simple rules, as do other species. Why should what anyone else believes, or does, be of concern unless it hurts you personally?
Why obey the most violent? Why should millions of people be maimed, tortured and murdered as in the USSR, Cambodia and elsewhere for meaningless philosophy?
Logic shows much of our social trauma: suicides, murders, road rage, terrorism and obnoxious behaviour generally (include rape and child molestation) to be logical consequence of the belief that nothing matters! When such belief comes in conflict with reality the fanatics fight reality. So, if you think YOUR life is worth living, don't throw it away because of ‘plausible’ emotional raving. Life is a wonderful opportunity, really worth time to check out and reach logical conclusions!
Human development
Development of human intelligence is our future; life is about creative achievement based on truth. At present we only use a small part of our brainpower and there is infinitely more to discover and enjoy!
But creative development is not the whole advantage humanity has; we must include human intellectual advance, caring, adventure, foresight and exploration. The awakening of human potential is rewarding beyond any other experience.
Natural human development should be a science-based study. Truth is the name of our God and truth means being sincere with what is true/correct/ honest/accurate rather than with lies/dishonest/faulty etc. It may be a leap of faith for many but even to glimpse our potential is to stimulate and expand our enthusiasm for intellectual development.
Deceit of children is not clever. Though robbery of mind uses sophisticated planning we can still access basic knowledge by combining learning with natural curiosity. Today the child that learns to read before going to school has a big advantage over its dumbed-down classmates but may find school frustrating.
True science is a marriage of logic and evidence! The key to political and cultural reform is to expose the union of emotion and lies used to deceive us. No logic or science has been offered to challenge the science or logic presented here; ‘plausible’ is not science. We only gain our social ideal with dedication to truth.
Policies and Dangers.
How was it that Humanist Ideology became, in so short time a world-wide movement if it was not planned and funded? As we have seen it has been under intense planning for at least one hundred years. Most of this time being needed to prepare the groundwork, manipulate power blocks and keep critical information from the public. World change cannot be invisible and evidence is massive.
Who does not know that 'our leaders' lie to us so why can't we see they serve alien interests? These small books explain it and how we can escape!
Terrorism is horrific but, for the abused, no more than a response of last resort. It is trivial compared to the secret, silent, mind-warp program designed to deform human behaviour and bring crime, terror, war and death to civilization? Our worry should not be about mice creating nuclear bombs to challenge the super powers, rather we need expose philosophy set to destroy our human nature.
Can any weapon of terror be worse than the plot to deform intellect and delete our birthright of human development?
Humanism is not bad because it promotes false caring but because it blinds us to what we need care about; the more we care about the irrelevant the less we understand things that matter.
They are clever and careful with words: “how do you feel about that” (you must feel, not think). They continually promote feelings. ‘Political correctness’ demands feel-good motivations! Don’t think, ‘get your head around it = accept it. We are soothed by double talk! “Convincing progress” means they want to ‘convince’ us they are making progress against evil and “plan to make a difference”, on our behalf??
Mindless feel-good intentions carry a cost beyond human ability to pay! As crime advances we need more police; as ill-health grows we need more medical staff. As people get dumbed down efficiency dies! As our situations get worse our abilities to cope get less. Be it "peak oil" or peak "common sense" the result must obey the same logic!
Politically correct philosophy ruins more lives than vengeful terrorists ever dream of. Humanism is not a biological virus or poison gas; it is a sweet-tasting feel-good, scam of ideology that is rotting the very fabric of an innocently trusting human culture – it is a little scroll of writing that tastes sweet to emotions but sickens when swallowed. (Revelation 10: 8-10.)
It is robbery of the pathetic poor by the obscene rich. It is usury-based insurance; disorientated medical care; corrupt law!
No law can reverse morality or change truth. How many teenagers now believe life values have no right or wrong? That it is our responsibility is to get what we can from a meaningless life or become ‘losers’? Parents cry for children who treat them with contempt – and never know why?
Matthew 16: 19-20 “… what you forbid on earth shall be forbidden in heaven, and what you allow on earth will be allowed in heaven. A frightening thought! But wait! If creation’s plan is that we develop in the rationality of our creator we will then know our true nature and on maturity be trust-worthy?
Our problems are within our ability to understand and fix if we just care enough to make the effort.
Step 18:
Who Will Speak?
In this atomic tyranny
Of blood and brains, who frames his speech, --
To leave both friend and foe so free
That manhood is evoked in each?
Who, in this bewildered hour
Of barbed intellect and strife,
Can act out of the heart’s full power,
Can forge and wield the fine edged knife
Of steeled and tempered consciousness,
To utter words so true and sharp
That they can cut the emptiness, --
Can pierce like tones plucked from a harp.
This stagnant moil of reeking air,
This farce of unreality,
That dupes the people to despair
And soddens their humanity?
Who can aim the heart’s blade true
And cleave the tawdry veil asunder,
With all his human statue, who
Can speak with lightening and with thunder, --
Can walk erect, wide eyed with death,
And walking, foil the wraiths of terror
Can summon thoughts with living breath
To grapple with the hordes of error?
And when the faithful are accused,
The wise deserted and denied,
When the humble are abused,
The free beset from every side.
Who will speak in such an hour,
Who, in face of shame and death,
Will act out of the heart’s full power,
Speak the truth with living breath.
Arvia Mackaye Ege
Who will speak? A very appropriate question at this time! A fine composition but will we find those who have enough love of truth to listen?
The ‘hard' ‘sciences demand we bow to principles of mathematical truth so what's wrong with us? Has brainwashing wiped out our ability for analytical thinking, or have we lost our common sense?
So what is the simple key to life's truth? As a child my grandfather told me this story: “When I was a boy I used to think it smart to tell lies until one day I overheard a conversation! One to another, “X is a good man, you can always rely on what he tells you as being true!” “I thought: I would like people to say that about me and determined to be truthful from then on.” Seeming trivial but small insight can change a life.
A few years later I read about the English King Harold. He had a friend who was a witch. When William the Conqueror invaded England she decided to ensure Harold’s victory by creating a banner embroidered with designs for victory and gathered the village maidens to work day and night. It was finished just in time as Harold set off for battle.
After a good night’s sleep the witch sat musing by the pond with the ducks and frogs; suddenly an awful truth dawned on her. She was really in love with Harold and had committed the greatest sin of witchcraft! She had not allowed for the bias this would create. So her designs for good would turn bad and her deign for victory would bring defeat. Too late to warn Harold and history shows his luck was bad.
Well, whatever we may think of witches the truth remains; if you want your plans to work you must respect truth. Let desires blind you to truth and the logic of your planning is corrupted. Elementary!
It is not that you love to much, it is that you don't love truth enough to sacrifice desire to truth. Truth is essential to planning and bias is easily seen in family situations. So many children would be better served if parents saw with honest eyes.
Life is for creating! The whole of the Creation is constructed in the truth of order and each construction reflects attributes of its creator.
Love is our inspiration, and truth of order the law for all construction; corruption of truth by love, pride or prejudice will return corrupt design.
The Challenge of Complexity
and the futility of chance:
Those who work in the physical sciences should recognize their responsibilities in relation to social order for social order is the foundation for intellectual achievement, a collapse of social order endangers all humanity; this is now apparent.
All involved with mathematics should have supported those who pointed out the faults in chance creation; all intellectuals should be exposing the deceit of a philosophy devoid of truth. Egotists cannot change reality; Intelligence should never allow them the right to try?
My explanation of intelligent design has no connection with others on a similar path but I see that an article in the Natural History magazine: voice of The American Museum of Natural History, (April 2002) featured a special report, "Intelligent Design". This provided three examples arguing for and three replies against. I need comment only on the first.
Michael J. Behe. Quote: "Every living cell contains many ultra sophisticated molecular machines. How can we decide whether Darwinian natural selection can account for the amazing complexity that exists at the molecular level?
Darwin himself set the standard when he acknowledged, "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
Here we find Darwin is not an analytical thinker or he would not have used a meaningless statement to back up his life’s work. Obviously there is no creation that could not be “formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications”; the meaningful question is: "could these be assembled by chance?"
Michael Behe uses a mousetrap as example of intelligent design because, until all its parts are assembled, it is useless as a mousetrap. His counterpart argues that each part has some use in its own right. Behe has a valid point but by failing to analyse it to logical conclusion (or exclusion) is countered by equally weak argument.
The alphabet of this writing is our example: Let’s put it this way: books are mainly composed of letters of the alphabet every one of which can be used to help express countless ideas. The adaptability of neither alphabet nor genes includes the foresight of creation. Designed for a purpose both need foresight of use before they can be designed and again before becoming part of another creation.
Evolutionists claim every book could be written by chance. In endless mixing, a ‘T’ could find itself in front of ‘H’ and later an ‘E’ could form THE. In this way words are formed and by similar chance the word ‘AFTER’ might find itself in front of ‘THE’ and in this way intelligent sentences could appear; each word is valid in its own right. This is called ‘plausible’! Can it also be called possible?
What is convenient to ignore is that, in the never-ending random shuffle, the T&H are more likely to be separated before the E is added. Each word alone has no survival advantage as its complete meaning depends on the context of its use.
As every student interested in the subject soon finds, every living creature has genes that may, or may not, be useful to it in any existing life situation. To maintain life-form efficiency, CHANCE is used to randomly create genetic DAMAGE and DELETION by natural selection.
If a damaged gene is of use to the life-form in its present environment, those with this gene damaged will be disadvantaged; therefore less competitive and eliminated; those with good genes survive so the viability of the life-form is not effected.
On the other hand if the gene damaged by chance is of no value to the life-form in its environment, then load of useless genes is reduced and in time that gene is eliminated from ALL members. Once eliminated it is not by chance restored, even if it comes to be needed at a later stage; as example the human case of Vitamin C.
The above process, called specialization is well established. So whether talking of books, life-forms or mouse traps, the principles of life apply. Life is based on principles more basic to life than the human genome or alphabet or bits of wood or steel. For creation, the order of truth must be deliberately arranged as required by foresight!
You see why we need deal with only one question. Evolution theory has been disproved over and over in so many ways that it seems a waste of time to express any variation of argument; there are already other examples in my work. So long as people believe criminal authorities without question, then evidence and logic remain irrelevant to them.
Chance is a destroyer of order not a creator of order! Neither chance nor natural selection can operate until there is a creation to provide options for chance and selection to operate on. These destroyers and preservers are very important but they have no intelligence, they cannot foresee future need and have no ability to assemble unnatural order for future service in an order of truth.
When our culture opens its mind it will see that there are no alternatives; life can only be created by intelligence.
Also the honest must admit that when Jesus said He represented life and truth He knew what he was saying. He told us that He represents truth and no one can know our Creator or the creation, except by understanding the truth of what has been created. Until we open our minds to understanding we will not understand.
Religions had the same problem with the challenge of Galileo, the reality did not fit with their preferred image of the universe. Pride forbade that they admit error even as their dogma was exposed to defeat.
For the same reason they later chose to evade the truth proclaimed by Jesus and surrendered humanity to Darwinism! Despite that He told us the base of life is truth (of order) and also that worldly wisdom would be refuted.
Criminals now run the world. Religions, bound in dogma, are too proud to admit error; law cringes before worldly power to deny justice while religion looks to philosophy for comfort.
Those who cannot doubt themselves have no faith in truth. We cannot believe in justice without accepting mercy: we will have to believe in spiritual life if we believe in physical life. We cannot have one side without the other. In failing to seek scientific truth to defeat the deceitful philosophy now ruling life on earth, religion is denying the creative force for the third time. As foretold!
Albert Einstein: "the significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
We are creating problems because our intellectual capacities are deformed. We passed a vital crossroads in human development, we need to return to our natural abilities: take the road at the sign pointing to “logical intelligent reasoning”.
Another famous inventor is reported to have said of some difficulty: ’This problem is too difficult for professionals, we will have to wait for some gifted amateur to solve it". The fact that so many technical and social problems have been solved by the self-educated is not because amateurs are more intelligent but because they, as individuals, learn by their passion for understanding the truth of their subject. They are not willing to just ‘parrot’ words without understanding as required by those taught learning as memorising.
Looking at latest research into DNA – the double helix – the built in controls that make life possible – it must become obvious to any who have learned to use their analytical powers that life could not begin until this remarkable system had been designed; order of truth has to be designed before creation begins.
The complex program for development of intelligent life could not begin until the principles for its organization were understood by intellect. Order has to be understood before design. Can any scientist explain how the primitive who set down the words of the Bible could know that the WORD (i.e. plan) had to come before the creation unless some intelligence was involved?
The complex program for development of intelligent life could not begin until the principles for its organization were understood by intellect. Order has to be understood before design. Can any scientist explain how the primitive who set down the words of the Bible could know that the WORD (i.e. plan) had to come before the creation unless intelligence was involved?
You may not yet believe what is revealed in this book though your instinct tells you it is true. That is why we need four more books to supply the mortar to hold our building blocks firmly in place. This structure needs now to be consolidated and having come this far I think you will be taking up the challenge.
Later books enlarge on, fill in and confirm what is here outlined. We cannot have realistic understanding of life without looking into the spiritual side. As we cannot have the one without the other: books 3 and 5 fold in spiritual aspects.
This is Book 1 of 5. To complete these studies continue in set order and combine with other literature on site. Coming to terms with our situation is the hard part! Having finished this introduction you should find the next four books much easier.
Matthew 20: 12-16, “ . thus will the last be first and the first last.”
You are given three layout alternatives with each book:
A/ Read version. This is the least refined but easiest to read on line or on screen. This layout requires 68 pages to printout.
B/ A4 download or printout (40 pages) delivers useful paper-saving as against printing out the Read version.
C/ Booklet direct-print from the Internet involves internet software and delivers a paper-saving booklet format printed on both sides of the paper: (may not work for all printers) center staple flat, then fold. Or fold and hand-stitch. (15 x A4 sheets of paper) and I recommend it as the hard-copy printout for easier understanding, paper saving and general convenience.
My apologies in that I am not able to spend the time needed to iron out all difficulties of communication and understanding. A.G.
For latest on these matters see
www.gniebxbeing.org.uk
Back to start >>
Foreword - The Hidden Face of Politics |