Climate Change
Life Change
Truth or Emotion

Print formats: A4-pdf | booklet-pdf

In advanced cultures we now detect a movement away from the cities.  It's as if a few people are beginning to see that what city life offers has been reduced to junk and squirm!  They look for some clean fresh reality and call it a sea-change because most move along the pleasant coastal strip.

Strangely, as it happens, the Christian Bible tells us that this old world will disappear and that the commercial empire ruling today will collapse!  A brand new world will appear – a world of living perfection that we cannot at present imagine; a world where we live by our own intelligence rather than by design of petty control-freak cultural manipulators.

Those of us who've lived to a 'ripe-old-age' may remember (with some nostalgia) an old-world that was also a very different world from what we have today.  In that world people were more honest and, compared to today, had a strange, more humane, attitude. 

In that world, when shopping or visiting, the key was left under the doormat so friends could let themselves in.  Children, town or country, could roam freely, meet new people and neither they, nor their parents had the fears so overpowering today.

Though they did not have our wealth of possessions they had contentment now rare to find.  I suspect we were then much nearer to the new world of tomorrow than now.

Are people beginning to awaken to the falsity (should that be "false city")?  Could we now imagine the passing of the crippled life attitude of today and the rebirth of humanity to a really new vision – a world not quite imaginable and in our condition seeming an impossible dream?

But if it is a possible dream, then we have to think about it today!  If we want to go there, we can only go there from where we are.  There is so much noise, mindless confusion and danger here, everyone is passionate about their beliefs and no-one knows what they are talking about because life is based on principles now hidden from us.
 
The average citizen fails to see Global Warming as a serious problem – maybe some day?  It seems in the nature of us humans that most are rather shy of taking responsibility for what we do.  A little meek is a good thing; we have the excuse that we know not what we do, but let's not kid ourselves.  As overpopulation meets hunger, dwindling resources and the death potential, of scientific war!  WAKE-UP WORLD!

Misleading philosophies have made world cultures very sick.  We need truth to help us see the light; or should I say – the dark; for without the dark for contrast we see nothing. Without light of truth in creation of order we could not exist!  Without the dark side, we cannot see the benefits of existing! These things now need understanding; simple reading is just not good enough!

We now find that principles of mass population control have been understood for over 500 years; we have its statement from Machiavelli. Quote: "One of the great secrets of the day is to know how to take possession of popular prejudices and passions in such a way as to introduce a confusion of principles which makes impossible all understanding between those who speak the same language and have the same interests."  End Q. 

But the Machiavelli statement seems unreal to our dumbed-down thinking and I found it's working sticky until I saw need to write:
"World government will win any contest against a commonalty denied cultural knowledge.  It will create divisions and increase regulation because one section of the community can be played against another until all are confused, divided and totally at its mercy". 

With language suited to our times, historic reality becomes clearer.  Modern context awakens, but we are still bound by our indoctrinated ideas as mind-manipulators play our minds between emotion and logic.

Reminders fall on reluctant ears: James Madison (Former US President) told us: "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: and a People who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."

The shoulders we stand on carry the wisdom of ages.  But our problems began with the “Watchers” of ancient times (see Of Truth) and progress was even more slyly sabotaged than the detour of human development seen by Winston Churchill, below.  But that foresight was nevertheless exceptional.  Quote from 1922: 

"From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing.  This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution.  It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire”.  E.Q.
 
Bythe time of Churchill's death that secretive power effectively ruled our world; the “Party System” is one of their deceits; we must not forget that because ending it is our precursor to freedom! But how can the enslaved know what to do?

We now know more of the New World Order; more of social sciences; more of the potential for war that includes genetically modified diseases; more of what is at stake, and more of the lengths to which the self-centered egomaniacs will go. 

The caring tried to awaken us but those manipulators from the dark underworld control the sound system and we, having let ourselves be led astray, remain astray.

So the puzzle of the Global Warming debate must be approached in the knowledge that we, for generations, have been controlled by the principle of Hegelian Dialectic –
"Thesis; Antithesis;" (the division that enables the synthetic conclusion) leaves us with whatever "Synthesis" the social engineers plan.

A confused and manipulated world needs be awakened and those who care about the human future will consider the following:
Adjustments for emphasis:

The World at 350:  A Last Chance
for Civilization.
By Bill McKibben, 11th May '08 Quote:

"Even for Americans, constitutionally convinced that there will always be a second act, and a third, and a do-over after that, and, if necessary, a little public repentance and forgiveness and a Brand New Start - even for us, the world looks a little Terminal right now.

It's not just the economy. We've gone through swoons before.  It's that gas at $4 a gallon means we're running out, at least of the cheap stuff that built our sprawling society. It's that when we try to turn corn into gas, it sends the price of a loaf of bread shooting upwards and starts food riots on three continents.   It's that everything is so inextricably tied together. It's that, all of a sudden, those grim Club of Rome types who, way back in the 1970s, went on and on about the "limits to growth" suddenly seem – how best to put it – right.
All of a sudden it isn't morning in America, it's dusk on planet Earth.

There's a number - a new number - that makes this point most powerfully. It may now be the most important number on Earth: 350, as in parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

A few weeks ago, our foremost climatologist, NASA's Jim Hansen, submitted a paper to Science magazine with several co-authors.

The abstract attached to it argued - and I have never read stronger language in a scientific paper -- "If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm."

Hansen cites six irreversible tipping points –
massive sea level rise and huge changes in rainfall patterns, among them - that we'll pass if we don't get back down to 350 soon; and the first of them, judging by last summer's insane melt of Arctic ice, may already be behind us.

So it's a tough diagnosis. It's like the doctor telling you that your cholesterol is way too high and, if you don't bring it down right away, you're going to have a stroke. So you take the pill, you swear off the cheese, and, if you're lucky, you get back into the safety zone before the coronary.  It's like watching the tachometer edge into the red zone and knowing that you need to take your foot off the gas before you hear that clunk up front.

In this case, though, it's worse ... we're not taking the pill and we are stomping on the gas - hard.  Instead of slowing down, we're pouring on the coal, quite literally.  Two weeks ago came the news that atmospheric carbon dioxide had jumped 2.4 parts per million last year - two decades ago, it was going up barely half that fast.

And suddenly, ... methane, another potent greenhouse gas, ... has unexpectedly begun to soar as well. Apparently, we've managed to warm the far north enough to start melting huge patches of permafrost and massive quantities of methane trapped beneath it have begun to bubble forth.

And don't forget: China is building more power plants; India is pioneering the $2,500 car, and Americans are converting to TVs the size of windshields that suck juice ever faster.

Here's the thing.  Hansen didn't just say that, if we didn't act, there was trouble coming; or, if we didn't yet know what was best for us, we'd certainly be better off below 350 ppm of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. His phrase was: 
"... if we wish to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed."

A planet with billions of people living near those oh-so-floodable coastlines. A planet with ever more vulnerable forests.  (A beetle, encouraged by warmer temperatures, has already managed to kill 10 times more trees than in any previous infestation across the northern reaches of Canada this year. This means far more carbon heading for the atmosphere and apparently dooms Canada's efforts to comply with the Kyoto Protocol, already in doubt because of its decision to start producing oil for the U.S. from Alberta's tar sands.)

We're the ones who kicked the warming off; now the planet is starting to take over... Melt all that Arctic ice, for instance, and suddenly the nice white shield that reflected 80% of incoming solar radiation back into space has turned to blue water that absorbs 80% of the sun's heat. Such feedbacks are beyond history, though not in the sense that Francis Fukuyama had in mind.

And we have, at best, a few years to short-circuit them - to reverse course. ... scientist and economist Rajendra Pachauri, who accepted the Nobel Prize on behalf of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last year (and, by the way, got his job when the Bush administration, at the behest of Exxon Mobil, forced out his predecessor): "If there's no action before 2012, that's too late. What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment."

In the next two or three years, the nations of the world are supposed to be negotiating a successor treaty to the Kyoto Accord. When December 2009 rolls around, heads of state are supposed to converge on Copenhagen to sign a treaty - a treaty that would go into effect at the last plausible moment to heed the most basic and crucial of limits on atmospheric CO2.

If we did everything right, says Hansen, we could see carbon emissions start to fall fairly rapidly and the oceans begin to pull some of that CO2 out of the atmosphere.
Before the century was out we might even be on track back to 350.

We might stop just short of some of those tipping points, like the Road Runner screeching to a halt at the very edge of the cliff. More likely, though, we're the Coyote - because "doing everything right" means that political systems around the world would have to take enormous and painful steps right away.

It means no more new coal-fired power plants anywhere, and plans to quickly close the ones already in operation. (Coal-fired power plants operating the way they're supposed to are, in global warming terms, as dangerous as nuclear plants melting down.)

It means making car factories turn out efficient hybrids next year [all electric much better], just the way we made them turn out tanks in six months at the start of World War II.  It means making trains an absolute priority and planes a taboo.

It means making every decision wisely because we have so little time and so little money, at least relative to the task at hand. And hardest of all, it means the rich countries of the world sharing resources and technology freely with the poorest ones, so that they can develop dignified lives without burning their cheap coal.

That's possible - we launched a Marshall Plan once, and we could do it again, this time in relation to carbon.  But in a month when the President has, once more, urged us to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, that seems unlikely.  In a month when the alluring phrase "gas tax holiday" has danced into our vocabulary, it's hard to see ...  And if it's hard to imagine sacrifice here, imagine China, where people produce a quarter as much carbon apiece as we do.

Still, as long as it's not impossible, we've got a duty to try.  In fact, it's about the most obvious duty humans have ever faced.

A few of us have launched a new campaign, 350.org. Its only goal is to spread this number around the world in the next 18 months ... in the hope that it will push those post-Kyoto negotiations in the direction of reality.

After all, those talks are our last chance; you can't do this one light bulb at a time. And if this 350.org campaign is a Hail Mary pass, well, some of those passes get caught.

We do have one thing going for us: This new tool, the Web which, at least, allows you to imagine something like a grassroots global effort. If the Internet was built for anything, it was built for sharing this number, for making people understand that "350" stands for a kind of safety, a kind of possibility, a kind of future.

Hansen's words were well-chosen: "a planet similar to that on which civilization developed."

People will doubtless survive on a non-350 planet but those who do will be so preoccupied, coping with the endless unintended consequences of an overheated planet that [our] civilization may not.

Civilization is what grows up in the margins of leisure and security provided by a workable relationship with the natural world. That margin won't exist, at least not for long, this side of 350. That's the limit we face".  End Quote.

Bill McKibben, co-founder of <350.org>is a scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College. His most recent book is "The Bill McKibben Reader".  From Site: TomDispatch.com

Whether we have three or thirty-three years the above is important – we don't have time to waste!  People think: "Oh these things happen over thousands of years but those who have read the Global Warming articles on the G><B site know change can come quickly.  Latest research shows areas of historic climate change of 6 degrees in 10 years and the Gulf Stream has already slowed 30%!

When the Gulf Stream stops much of Europe will quickly become frozen wasteland; that in itself will mean a large reduction in food production and a large movement of population.  We are warned that we will make the planet unlivable!  Yes, we can do that with modern technology of warfare.

Climate Change means unknown weather and food shortages on a planet populated to bursting with dumbed-down people having no discipline and toughness to face hard times – riots and life/death fighting between cultures could end us? 

As hinted in previous articles, this world could be in shambles of disease and violence with civilization virtually wiped out by the end of this century. Now:

Comment from David Wilcock (www.divinecosmos.com).
Emphasis added. How much is climate influenced by galactic environment?

Quote:  "That the Sun's magnetic field is over 230 percent stronger now than it was at the beginning of the 1900s, and its overall energetic activity has sizably increased, creating a frenzy of activity that continues to embarrass NASA's official predictions. 

In the last 30 years, Earth's icecaps have thinned out by as much as 40 percent. Quite inexplicably, just since 1997 the structure of the Earth has shifted from being slightly more egg-shaped, or elongated at the poles, to more pumpkin-shaped, or flattened at the poles. No one at NASA has even bothered to try to explain this yet.

The glowing plasma at the leading edge of our Solar System has recently increased 1000 percent. Russian and NASA data has confirmed that the front end of the Sun's magnetic field has become over 1000 percent brighter in the last 30+ years.

We know that if you rub a piece of metal fast enough, you create what is known as friction, and the metal will begin glowing red-hot. In the same manner, the extra dust and energy in this new galactic energy zone is colliding with the Sun's magnetic field, causing friction and creating a visible static charge of plasma energy at the front that is rapidly increasing in size and brightness.

As of 1997, Dr. Aleskey Dmitriev and other Russian scientists observed that the Galactic space we are now moving into is showing significantly higher concentrations of matter and energy, including charged particles of hydrogen, helium and hydroxyl, in addition to other new combinations of elements.

In August 2003, an ESA/NASA experiment called DUST, launched with the Ulysses satellite in 1990, has discovered that there is 300% more dust entering the Solar System now than there was throughout all of the 1990s.

If this item is an accurate assessment, then "global warming" has a cosmic cause; and the present acceleration of catastrophic weather (melting glaciers and polar ice, hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, wildfires, earthquakes) cannot be blamed only on earthly causes, such as SUV exhaust emissions!"  End quote.

INTERESTING!  Not much from public media about solar plasma and magnetic fields in relation to Global Warming.  Without evidence it may not follow that this is significant and we do have real scientific evidence to understand main features of our situation.  That last underlined above seems more a statement of desire than logic.

Warnings, you may also notice, may come from unlikely people: Example: "Rajendra Pachauri, who accepted the Nobel Prize on behalf of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change last year." The U.N. pretends concern but the G><B site explains that as Globalists control the media they don't need worry about the truth.  They are confident of their control of the public mind.

Controlled exposure gives them credibility. However it is good to have revealing statements, leaked or not! We have the numbers to win.  Globalists do not believe an awakening possible!

But we need to unite and pull together far more effectively.  We have to stop trying to sit on a non-existing fence; there is no neutral ground between good and evil (life and death)!  Too often we choose our 'facts' on emotional 'feelings' to avoid effort of challenge.

The comment on the changing shape of earth is of interest as it is explained by the melt of the ice caps and rise of sea level.  Whatever the forces involved, these events must change the shape of the earth because solid weight is moved from the ends of the earth where mainly under force of gravity to the more southern-central; here the oceans dominate and centrifugal forces have their greatest effect.  Earth's shape is under forces of gravity and spin; forces that move earth's fragile crust.

Movement of this crust will bring increasing volcanic and earthquake activity; perhaps already beginning.  As a liquid has more liberty to change shape it seems natural the earth will become slightly larger around the lower middle and a little flatter at the poles.

Warming (by manmade pollution) is already releasing earth-bound pollution, and if volcanic action increases, that will add to it.  Though the immediate effect of ash and dust in the air is cooling.  The long-term effects will be to increase the pollution that caused warm-stagnant-poisonous oceans in the first place; that came from the melted elements and excessive carbon of earth's formation.

That equation has worked through five cycles over some millions of years.  How much evidence do we need to prove that the balance is critical?  Why, if man continues to return this pollution to the atmosphere would it not again upset that frail balance? Why are we not doing anything realistic to control it?

All the early signs say it is happening but because we (in mass) have been dumbed down and because those doing the dumbing down concentrate on self-interest they may be no more aware of climate change consequences than we. Their abiding impulse is to look after their own shallow emotional interests.

There are many points of confusion!  Because an earth change event may take thousands of years to work through people tend to think there is no urgency!  They think it will be many generations before the earth becomes un-livable to man. 

But there are known times where serious weather change has wiped out civilizations, these probably include the flood of the Old Testament.  Earth changes take thousands of years but begin with climate change; that is what challenges us today!  If we ignore it, this delicate balance could decide our fate!

The carbon tipping point is delicate.  Upsets such as increased volcanic action or meteor impacts are the most likely starting points of earlier reversals.  When an over-populated world needs artificial and genetically modified foods that increase health problems, irrational behavior and magnify labor costs; situations are also created that result in population movements and reduced food production.  We already have problems that lead to further problems.

When we have communities that behave with animal instincts in a high technology world we compound ingredients for population meltdown – do we lose 30 or 75% of people within a generation or so?  Will nature, wars and diseases match the torments forecast in "Revelations of John"? 

By continuing to release massive pollution into the atmosphere over the next ten years a cyclical event that might normally recur every few hundred years may well become a full-fledged major earth cleansing requiring 100 thousand years to work through.

Would people be so reluctant to face up to their responsibility if not misled about understanding of natural forces?

Another point of confusion is that of "peak oil production":  Arguments about whether we have reached it or not are misleading!  We are driven by hysteria of rising cost to think our problem is oil when it's our behavior that is the real threat.

The "Hegelian Dialectic" process is used to confuse and misdirect action because the needed action would cripple and destroy the "Great Whore" of commerce.

So now a clipping from
"Peak Oil and Politicians":
by Kelpie Wilson published 17th May 2008.  Follow it up at "TRUTHOUT".  Quote:

"In 1956, M. King Hubbert, a petroleum geologist with Shell Oil, presented a paper to the American Petroleum Institute that predicted US oil production would peak in the early 1970s.  He got a call from his bosses at Shell, who asked him to "tone it down."  His reply was that there was nothing to tone down.  It was just straightforward analysis.  He presented the paper, unedited.  ... Since that time, the oil industry and its political supporters have done everything they can to tone down the message that oil is a finite resource and that we will run out of it some day.  Why would they do that?  To further the short-sighted, short-term pursuit of profit.

In 2004, Shell finally got caught in a lie about the size of its oil reserves. The company had inflated the stated size of its oil reserves to keep stock share prices high because who wants to invest in a company - or an industry - that is going the way of the dinosaurs?

Since 1956, the world economy has proceeded under a sort of oil company spell that has woven the illusion all around us that oil depletion is so far into the future that we don't need to worry about it. That belief was essential to support the aim of an endlessly growing economy.

The pro-growth faction reacted quickly and scathingly to the idea that there could be limits to growth. The MIT scientists were treated like Cassandras in academia and in the press. ... "Ever since then, it has somehow been "not polite" to talk about limits to growth. Today, despite skyrocketing oil prices, most politicians still avoid the term "peak oil." Most of the media still treat peak oil advocates with skepticism, using epithets like "fringe" and "so-called" to describe peak oil theory.  [Note: as they did with conspiracy.]

Even a plateau is a big problem for a world economy that is based on growth. In a world where 850 million are still going hungry and 3 billion out of 6.5 billion live on less than $2 a day, stagnant oil production means an end to development models based on economic growth. The statistics show that oil production has been flat for more than two years now". End quote.

Report of a huge new oil field in the USA is very convenient: so we don't need to worry about peak oil???  Would more cheap crude save us?  Or would it destroy our last hope? 

We can argue to death but to save ourselves we, the people, must take political control!  Our urgency is for democratic access to truth and action.

Those who trust truth and have followed the reporting on www.gniebxbeing.org.uk know that "Peak-oil" is only a consequent of our problem.  Energy is not our problem!  Deceit and usury of people by commerce for its own glorification is the problem!  What's running out is TIME.

We have proven cheap clean energy resources; sun and geothermal for example.  Even with existing technology it is proven that we could have avoided the endangering pollution.
 
This is a time for serious action because it is peak of manipulation that will destroy us: not peak of available oil.

But Globalism, through its captive governments, looks to save itself!  To them the problem looks simple: 'eliminate the surplus people'.  Deletion of the polluting masses would give them world ownership and the best possible chance of survival.

A reading of the literature for and against climate change shows deliberate confusing influence.  The governing principles of creation reveal the need for truth in order of safe structures – including life.  All creation represents the reality of order of truth. 

When we look at the arguments for and against warming; or the truth of human responsibility for it, we see that those who accept responsibility look to serious science, while those who seek to avoid responsibility put the blame on nature and fix attention on plausible emotional argument.

So while there's no doubt that natural cycles occur over a variety of time-spans and that we are now in a natural warming cycle, it should also be clear that this cycle is being pushed far beyond natures rhythm by misuse of obviously natural elements that act by cause and effect.  This artificial stimulation is by forces of human arrogance such as lust, pride, sloth, willful-waste and deceit!

These are the influences and attitudes behind the huge growth of excessive pollution.  So the PUBLIC argument is really between the truth of logical/natural order and the desires of unnaturally stimulated emotion.

It seems far beyond coincidental that the nature of creation and its challenges turn out to be as forecast by Christian revelation.  It is time we accept adult status and give up the SantaClaus god.  Our Creator
is the Intelligence that creates in the order of truth! 
John 14-6
"I am the way, I am life, I am Truth."

So the best forecast of our time seems to be from Revelation of John where we are shown to suffer increasing torments.

Will we cause ourselves increased suffering until all who may be saved admit to truth!  If so we may still have a few years left in which to turn things around.  If not, a lot will lose their chance to change – to see the error of their ways. 

www.gniebxbeing.org.uk  This is a site that covers these matters in a depth.  It allows the understanding needed for planning effective action. Those seeking truth, having read the books in set order and other information on this site, will realize that everything in this article is well supported.

What is truth?
What is money?
How did life originate?
Truth is the science of reality!
Love is the science of sacrifice!
Plausible is the science of seduction!
Wisdom is the science of understanding.

If we are to act effectively in our own best interests we must have the true democracy of the people by the people, governing themselves.  Democracy gives the people access to truth!  To gain the progress true democracy allows we must choose & elect our own representatives.

Authoritative action needs accurate information not just 'what we want you to think plausible garbage' as now handed down by Globalist, World Government 'gods'.

This base for understanding is a lifetime of independent work by a person actually serious about true human development.  No commercial interests are involved.  Nothing to pay!  Have your say at www.gniebxbeing.org.uk

These things need to be understood!
"If you wouldst know the secret of the True, let pass the word,
 the thought,  the thought,  pursue!" From ancient writing, see Book 3.
  Reading for memory alone is small help! Always seek understanding!

So let's just summarize this essay: 
An entire human culture has been misled and now has its chance to gain the mind-freedom of human maturity!

Who will take their opportunity?
Peak oil, true or not, is used to decoy the mind away from the real danger.  It's time that is running out!  In an overpopulated world greed directs use of wrong resources and the early stages of Global Warming will severely cut food production! 

Read the thoughts of the best brains produced by humanity from every continent and from ancient times to our times!

The Creator of life is not concerned about matters trivial! Scriptural warning that we will endanger all life on earth is not about wasted resources!  It is that we allow those who profit from deceit to seduce us to ignore our intellectual gift and give favor to animal instincts of emotion and greed.  As result, when the pressure is on, we will be driven to war with atomic, biological and chemical poisons that have capacity to destroy all life.
  
The literature on the G><B site is not just a collection of interest.  Each item relates to the others to build up a realistic picture of humanity – of life's creation – of its meaning and its principles of being.  These things need to be understood and related to each other to the limits of our ability, simple reading to remember words is time wasting!

Books should be read in numbered order as if a single book. Thank you.
www.gniebxbeing.org.uk